Baseball is over . . .

at least for the sox. So I reminded myself that I actually work at a university -- with access to a tremendous amount of books. We'll see if I get through them.


Nixonland by Rick Pearlstein: I really have heard terrific things about this book. I am not even looking forward to it from a Watergate perspective. I think that it actually depicts the environment of the country at the time of the rise of Nixon. These books always reveal political landscapes that are more similar to today then I think we realize. Reading Hunter Thompson's book about the campaign in 1972 really drives that point home. So many of the divisions are the same. While we use different code words and different scapegoats -- we are really still fighting taking on McCarthy, sadly without a Murrow.


The Great Railway Bazaar by Paul Theroux: This is not the recent book by Theroux, but the original, from 1973. He takes a train from London to Japan and back. First on a southerly route, through much of the land that is in our current chaos. He returns traveling through the Soviet Union. If I enjoy this book, I am sure that I will read his current follow-up. For the same reasons that he wrote it. What makes them most interesting (if they are) are the differences that have taken place.

My pretentious pick for the day is, What is Literature by Jean-Paul Sartre. Kind of on a whim. I used to enjoy Sartre's writing, but haven't visited in a while. I am guessing I will not finish this, but thought I'd give it a shot.

Paul Theroux

I listened to this podcast the other day -- Paul Theroux on the Leonard Lopate show. I linked to the podcast below, but it doesn't seem to be appearing -- here is a link to a page with the interview.



He recently wrote a book Ghost Train to the Eastern Star: On the Tracks of the Great Railway Bazaar, retracing a trip he took and wrote about in 1973. The trip is from London to Japan.

I am not sure I will ever read this, but I did find a few points very interesting. He feels that some of the old soviet-bloc countries are in worse shape today then when he was there previously. This is not because things were good then and are not now. It more has to do with the fact that their identity then had to do with freeing themselves from the oppression of the Soviet Union. That was their sense of purpose. Now it seems, they have lost their identity -- and are so western focused that they have lost a sense of self. And since I feel like we have lost our own identity, I can't imagine that much can be gained by gazing in the distance at what the west has become. We have become a country where our westerness is about the things that we have and the consumption we are addicted to. We are removed from the ideals that we once aspired to. And when you, yourself no longer aspire to be a greater nation, it is impossible to expect to inspire others to wish to be greater themselves. They are left in worst possible circumstances. They are envious of our economic prosperity (relatively speaking) and as uninterested in the ideals of our republic as our own people are.

Not sure where all this is going. I will try to revisit soon.